From bf465adec8097ae9f1d728cb83f464f5bb17080e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kar Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:16:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 3f1529d..b799f1b 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ wonder i need license to use, make use, develop even to share *something. i see license as a ninja technique to constrain, -restrain, Jail(see the terms of BSD/Macintosh jail - that was intent to constrain some apps over the whole system not for the owner). +restrain, Jail(see the terms of BSD/Macintosh jail - +that was intent to constrain some apps over the +whole system not for the owner). i met no one is able to create a fresh new *something as all *something s are advancement @@ -18,7 +20,10 @@ one can make money without constraining technology-> do you really think with the source code of window$ you can make and continue the development of there tool without there experience and resources? -plus a reverse example: so many copyleft violations. inspite of copyleft linux along with GNU tools are being included into ****. +plus a reverse example: so many copyleft violations. +inspite of copyleft linux along with GNU tools are +being included into ****. + i see beings are developers not creators, wonder how some one can restrain any *something i.e. idea/knowledge/experience/technology