From c6c6a1fac0aa09634f322c9aeba5afee0b79ad99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kar Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:15:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add README.md --- README.md | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 README.md diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f1529d --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +i am no one to make judgement on license. +there may be a license to drive, license to go abroad, +to fly, to ride even to kill. +wonder i need license to use, make use, develop +even to share *something. + +i see license as a ninja technique to constrain, +restrain, Jail(see the terms of BSD/Macintosh jail - that was intent to constrain some apps over the whole system not for the owner). + +i met no one is able to create a fresh new +*something as all *something s are advancement +or developed (উন্নয়ন -> অগ্রসর) from some +one else. + i understand there some logic can be made up: +the developer/company needs money how some +one can make money without constraining technology-> + +do you really think with the source code of window$ +you can make and continue the development of there +tool without there experience and resources? +plus a reverse example: so many copyleft violations. inspite of copyleft linux along with GNU tools are being included into ****. +i see beings are developers not creators, wonder +how some one can restrain any +*something i.e. idea/knowledge/experience/technology