TL;DR 𝐍𝐈𝐑𝐕𝐀𝐍𝐀
=====================================================
Nirvana License, i.e. Beings needs no license
=====================================================

Preamble
------------
GNU, MIT, APACHE, Opensource, Source available,
proprietary license -
So many options, why a new one?
  To add / remove confusion may be, or
Just to remind Humans, you have evolved to as
being, you don't need one. Having license is like
having limitation, boundation not freedom, You 
can have a Driving license and drive irresponsibly,
license provider / authority can impose some
nonsense rules. No matter how hard we try, Beings
don't like to be bound, limited...
They want freedom... little more - Nirvana.
-----------------------------------------------------

Experience
------------
Best of the best GPL(copyleft) and it's derivatives
are confusing which one to choose & its protected
by copyright laws, but i get the idea of 4 freedoms. 
Developers don't want to deal with lawyers (seems 
wasting years), we want to build something.
I have seen license violation a lot, as they have 
a fleet of lawyers.
I have seen Open Source is being used a suppressor
to GNU,GPL -Freedom centric ones. Going against the
ideology of creator of the open source definition 
Bruce Perens, Eric S. Raymond,
i.e. some one can go commercial without restraining
*something i.e. idea/knowledge/experience/technology
-----------------------------------------------------


Quote
--------
Every rule / law has an exception except this.
Beings do not need a license, enough to have sense.
- Suvankar Sarkar (AKA "Kar" the No One)
-----------------------------------------------------

=====================================================
Mentioned some licenses above(Preamble) good to bad,
there may be some reason to use any existing license.
you are free to choose this one, defined below.
.....................................................