initial commit
This commit is contained in:
202
todo/README.md
Normal file
202
todo/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
# NextJS Boilerplate - TODO & Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains comprehensive checklists for improving the NextJS boilerplate across different areas. Each checklist is designed to be actionable with clear priorities and implementation guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📁 Available Checklists
|
||||
|
||||
### 🚀 [Performance Optimization](./PERFORMANCE_OPTIMIZATION.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority**: 🔴 Critical
|
||||
**Current Issue**: LCP 2.6s (needs to be < 1.2s)
|
||||
**Key Focus**: Remove blocking startup checks, implement Redis caching, optimize auth context
|
||||
|
||||
**Major Issues**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Blocking database checks delay page rendering by ~1.5s
|
||||
- Every page load hits MongoDB for user data (~0.5s)
|
||||
- Auth context makes unnecessary API calls (~0.25s)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Improvement**: 2.6s → 0.4s LCP (80% improvement)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 🔐 [Security Improvements](./SECURITY_IMPROVEMENTS.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority**: 🟡 Medium
|
||||
**Focus**: Production-ready security standards
|
||||
**Key Areas**: Rate limiting, password policies, email verification, security headers
|
||||
|
||||
**Major Gaps**:
|
||||
|
||||
- No rate limiting on authentication endpoints
|
||||
- Weak password requirements (6 chars minimum)
|
||||
- No email verification system
|
||||
- Missing security headers and monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
**Target**: OWASP Top 10 compliance + industry security standards
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 🏗️ [Code Quality Improvements](./CODE_QUALITY_IMPROVEMENTS.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority**: 🟢 Low-Medium
|
||||
**Focus**: Maintainability and developer experience
|
||||
**Key Areas**: Error handling, type safety, documentation, accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Improvement Areas**:
|
||||
|
||||
- Standardize error handling patterns
|
||||
- Improve TypeScript strict mode usage
|
||||
- Add comprehensive API documentation
|
||||
- Enhance accessibility compliance
|
||||
|
||||
**Target**: Production-ready code quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Critical Performance Issues (Week 1)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Priority: 🔴 CRITICAL - Blocks good user experience
|
||||
Target: Fix LCP from 2.6s to < 1.2s
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Immediate Actions:
|
||||
1. Remove blocking startup checks from layout
|
||||
2. Implement Redis caching for /me endpoint
|
||||
3. Optimize auth context with localStorage
|
||||
4. Move database connections to background
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Result: ~2s improvement in page load time
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Security Hardening (Week 2-3)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Priority: 🟡 MEDIUM - Required for production
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Essential Security:
|
||||
1. Add rate limiting to auth endpoints
|
||||
2. Strengthen password requirements
|
||||
3. Implement basic security headers
|
||||
4. Add environment variable validation
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Result: Production-ready security baseline
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Code Quality & Long-term (Month 2+)
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Priority: 🟢 LOW-MEDIUM - Important for maintenance
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Quality Improvements:
|
||||
1. Standardize error handling
|
||||
2. Improve type safety
|
||||
3. Add API documentation
|
||||
4. Enhance accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
Expected Result: Better maintainability and developer experience
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Targets
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Current | Target | Priority |
|
||||
| --------------- | ------- | --------- | ----------- |
|
||||
| **LCP** | 2.6s | < 1.2s | 🔴 Critical |
|
||||
| **FID** | TBD | < 100ms | 🟡 Medium |
|
||||
| **CLS** | TBD | < 0.1 | 🟡 Medium |
|
||||
| **Bundle Size** | TBD | Optimized | 🟢 Low |
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Targets
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Rate limiting on all auth endpoints
|
||||
- ✅ Strong password policies
|
||||
- ✅ Security headers implementation
|
||||
- ✅ Vulnerability scanning setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Targets
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Standardized error handling
|
||||
- ✅ Comprehensive type safety
|
||||
- ✅ API documentation coverage
|
||||
- ✅ Accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 AA)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🛠️ Usage Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
### For Developers
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Review relevant checklist** based on your focus area
|
||||
2. **Pick items matching your sprint capacity**
|
||||
3. **Check off completed items** as you implement them
|
||||
4. **Update progress** in team standups
|
||||
5. **Test changes** against success metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### For Project Managers
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Use checklists for sprint planning**
|
||||
2. **Prioritize based on color coding** (🔴 🟡 🟢)
|
||||
3. **Track completion percentage** for each area
|
||||
4. **Schedule regular reviews** of progress
|
||||
5. **Coordinate dependencies** between improvements
|
||||
|
||||
### For QA/Review
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Use checklists as acceptance criteria**
|
||||
2. **Verify implementation** matches requirements
|
||||
3. **Test performance improvements** with real metrics
|
||||
4. **Validate security enhancements** with appropriate tools
|
||||
5. **Check code quality** against standards
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📈 Progress Tracking
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Status
|
||||
|
||||
- **Performance**: ❌ Critical issues identified
|
||||
- **Security**: ⚠️ Basic implementation, gaps exist
|
||||
- **Code Quality**: ✅ Good foundation, improvements available
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Review Date
|
||||
|
||||
- **Performance**: After critical fixes (Week 1)
|
||||
- **Security**: After basic hardening (Week 3)
|
||||
- **Code Quality**: Monthly review cycle
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🤝 Contributing
|
||||
|
||||
When working on improvements:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Check off items** as you complete them in the relevant checklist
|
||||
2. **Add notes or modifications** if implementation differs from suggestions
|
||||
3. **Update this README** if you add new checklists or change priorities
|
||||
4. **Test your changes** against the defined success metrics
|
||||
5. **Document any new issues** discovered during implementation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔄 Maintenance
|
||||
|
||||
These checklists should be:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reviewed quarterly** for relevance and completeness
|
||||
- **Updated** when new issues are discovered
|
||||
- **Archived or consolidated** when items become outdated
|
||||
- **Enhanced** based on team feedback and industry best practices
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Last Updated**: Current
|
||||
**Owner**: Development Team
|
||||
**Review Cycle**: Monthly for active items, quarterly for completed sections
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user