30 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
i am no one to make judgement on license.
|
|
there may be a license to drive, license to go abroad,
|
|
to fly, to ride even to kill.
|
|
wonder i need license to use, make use, develop
|
|
even to share *something.
|
|
|
|
i see license as a ninja technique to constrain,
|
|
restrain, Jail(see the terms of BSD/Macintosh jail -
|
|
that was intent to constrain some apps over the
|
|
whole system not for the owner).
|
|
|
|
i met no one is able to create a fresh new
|
|
*something as all *something s are advancement
|
|
or developed (উন্নয়ন -> অগ্রসর) from some
|
|
one else.
|
|
i understand there some logic can be made up:
|
|
the developer/company needs money how some
|
|
one can make money without constraining technology->
|
|
|
|
do you really think with the source code of window$
|
|
you can make and continue the development of there
|
|
tool without there experience and resources?
|
|
plus a reverse example: so many copyleft violations.
|
|
inspite of copyleft linux along with GNU tools are
|
|
being included into ****.
|
|
|
|
i see beings are developers not creators, wonder
|
|
how some one can restrain any
|
|
*something i.e. idea/knowledge/experience/technology
|